"Our Children and Grandchildren are not merely statistics towards which we can be indifferent" JFK

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Short sellers actually receive positive press (apparently they actually conduct research and do not rely on CNBC or comic books) and the HOG gets dirty

How short-selling sleuths spot accounting
gimmicks on financial reports

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- With the economy mired in a deep slump and sales slowing, many companies found it necessary last year to reduce inventory.

Not Monsanto Co. Instead, the agricultural seed giant was building inventory. That raised questions among analysts at the Center for Financial Research and Analysis, who dig through corporate financial statements with the detail of a forensic expert.

Their goal: to tell institutional investors when stocks are worth selling or avoiding altogether. In February 2010, CFRA put Monsanto on its "biggest concerns" list.

"Most companies had been reducing inventories (in 2009), except Monsanto," said Jeremy Perler, co-director of research at CFRA. "Their inventories were building rapidly. That's a pretty powerful flag for an investor."

As the 2010 second-quarter earnings season wraps up, CFRA and other accounting sleuths are once again scouring the latest reports for disconnects between what company executives are telling investors and what the numbers are saying.

"When there is something bad going on, they'll do whatever they can to hide it," said Perler, who with Howard Schilit co-authored the most recent edition of "Financial Shenanigans: How to Detect Accounting Gimmicks & Fraud in Financial Reports."

While not a simple task, spending a few hours combing a company's earnings release and more-detailed quarterly and annual financial reports (10-Qs and 10-Ks) can make a difference in making money or losing your shirt.

Yet you don't have to be a forensic accountant to spot trouble on a financial statement. Here are several line items on a balance sheet you should focus on to gauge a company's strength, including inventories, free cash flow, and accounts receivable.


1. Inventories
 
Monsanto /quotes/comstock/13*!mon/quotes/nls/mon (MON 57.84, -0.07, -0.12%) had high hopes for two new seed products. Inventories of SmartStax and Roundup Ready Two Yield seeds were growing at a healthy clip through the fall of 2009 and into this year. The seeds were crucial to Monsanto's stated plan to double gross profit margin by 2012, which would bolster overall corporate profit.
 
But Monsanto was having trouble convincing customers to buy existing products that competitors sold for less. This forced the company to slash prices to clear older inventory just after it stocked up on new seeds.
 
As a result, Monsanto reported 17% year-over-year inventory growth for the quarter ended in November 2009. Meanwhile, analysts had forecast Monsanto to grow sales by 1% over the subsequent nine months, CFRA pointed out in a report.
 
Typically, inventories should rise at about the same pace as sales. If a company's inventories are growing faster than sales or expected sales growth, it's a clue that products aren't moving. In that case, gross margins could get squeezed.
 
The crunch soon caught up with Monsanto. The company rescinded its gross margin target, cut its profit outlook twice, and shaved sales expectations for SmartStax and Roundup. And the shares plunged 32% from April through May. By then, Monsanto had slashed its 2010 profit target to a range of $2.40 to $2.60 a share, down from $3.10 to $3.30 a share a month earlier.

2. Free cash flow

Worldcom's meteoric rise in the telecommunications world came to a crashing halt in late June of 2002. Worldcom took many by surprise when it restated five quarters of results, erasing a profit it had once presented to investors. The company's demise was swift.

Weeks later, WorldCom filed for bankruptcy in what became an $11 billion accounting fraud. While WorldCom portrayed itself as a profitable company, the company's free cash flow painted a picture of shaky enterprise, Perler and Schilit wrote in "Financial Shenanigans."

In 1999, the company reported free cash flow of $2.3 billion. A year later, free cash flow was negative $3.8 billion. Such a large swing in free cash flow is a warning sign.

A significant drop in free cash flow may occur when a company makes a big acquisition, buys new equipment, or throws money behind a new product.

Companies don't always calculate free cash flow in their financial statements. Often, you have to do it yourself by pulling "cash flow from operations" and "capital expenditures" from the cash flow statement presented each quarter. Free cash flow is cash flow from operations minus capital expenditures.

Why is free cash flow important? It's the money left over at the end of each quarter after all the bills are paid. A company can use this money to pay a dividend, trim debt, make an acquisition, or buy back stock.

"You want to see cash growing or what the companies are doing with the cash," said Eric Heyman, director of research at the Olstein Funds. "Companies with cash on their balance sheet have lots more flexibility than a company that doesn't, regardless of economic conditions."

3. Accounts receivable

Another area to check is accounts receivable, or payments due from customers. In addition to how much a company is owed, receivables also tell when it expects to be paid.

To make this calculation, divide revenue by the number of days in the reporting period. Then divide the figure given for receivables by this result.

What you don't want to see is receivables rising at a much faster pace than sales. This suggests a company is shipping too much product into the channel and possibly extending collection payment terms.

Several years ago, receivables at Harley-Davidson Inc.raised eyebrows at research firm Behind The Numbers, which issues sell recommendations to its hedge fund and mutual fund clients.

"There were years Harley-Davidson sold more inventory to the distributor" than the distributor could sell, said Jeff Middleswart, president of Behind The Numbers.

"They were financing the distributor as well," he said. "So essentially, Harley was financing its own sales."

Investors didn't show Harley the same leeway. Sales and profit slumped, along with Harley's shares. By April 2008, earnings expectations seemed enough in line with reality for Behind The Numbers to lift its warning on the stock. Link to complete article and Dell shenanigans

Grandpa: In the words of Scarlett O'hara, "I can't think about that right now. If I do, I'll go crazy. I'll think about that tomorrow". She should have listened to Rhett, "You're like the thief who isn't the least bit sorry he stole, but is terribly, terribly sorry he's going to jail".
 

Yes Scarlett,  publically traded companies play games in an effort to keep their stock price at a hefty premium. Unfortunately, most analysts fail to peek under the covers as they do not want anything getting in the way of their buy or strong buy recommendatoins. They have stock inventory to move and listening to more than CNBC or reading comic books could present a challenge to their trading desks. IT IS FRAUD Scarlett however no one goes to jail, they simply pay the SEC out of petty cash.
 
If you only listened Scarlett...I told you the balance
sheet was suspect...



Should have done your homework...cry me a river...
you thought because they are publicly traded they
do not fib?
 

China manufacturing contracts in July: HSBC survey

By Michael Kitchen LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) 

One of two key gauges of China's manufacturing sector registered a contraction in July, the first such pull-back since March 2009. Reported results from the HSBC China Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index for July, released Monday, fell to 49.4, down from 50.4 in June and below the important 50-point level that separates expansion from contraction.

The PMI survey, formerly conducted by broker CSLA, last showed a contraction in March 2009. A rival survey, released Sunday by the Chinese government's China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing, fell to 51.2, down from 52.1 in June.

Grandpa: OH NO, conflicting economic data! It would never happen in a Democracy like the United States of America. Might China be experiencing early signs of Bernanke-itis (a.k.a. "unusual uncertainty")? I thought China was going to pull the entire globe out of the economic gutter. Do not worry, CNBC will present a positive spin before the opening bell as they have all night to crunch copy.

Recap of July 2010 Economic Data...The Folly Continues

Yes America, the folly within the U.S. Equity Market continues. The NASDAQ, S and P 500 and of course the all important 30 Dow Jones Industrial Average inflicted tremendous pain on anyone shorting the market based on fundamental economic data. The bullish algorithmic gamers took the month from the bears (you know, the one's that don't rely on CNBC or comic books for their analysis) and launched the S and P 500 6.88%. Naturally, the trading volume was anemic however the movement afforded another month of paid advertising and busload of Mensa-like portfolio managers on CNBC.

When the CNBC pundits emphatically urge the retail investor to "get in the game" (sounds like Cramer screaming in the background). Research the data released during the month yourself and decide if you want the children's college fund placed in Mr. Market. Hey, what does grandpa know, many "experts" on CNBC deem this to be a generational buying opportunity...you know, if your time horizon is long term (a.k.a. 20+ years). Grandpa wishes you the very best in whatever you decide. The following are "just the facts" reported during the month.


July Economic Data

  • Weekly initial jobless claims averaged 457,000 for the month 
  • May Pending Home Sales DOWN 30% month over month and down 15.9% year over year
  • Domestic vehicle sales for June: 8.4 million annualized units verus consensus of 8.9 million annualized units (May reported at 8.9 million annualized units)
  • Construction spending for May -0.2% versus consensus estimates of -0.9% (April revised to +2.3% from +2.7%)
  •  Non-farm payrolls for June DOWN 125,000 on a consensus estimate of down 100,000
  • Unemployment rate dropped to 9.5% from 9.7% (grandpa opts not to comment...)
  •  Factory Orders for May DOWN 1.4% versus consensus estimate of down 0.6% (April month revised to +1.0% from +1.2%)
  •  ISM Services for June 53.8 versus consensus of 55 (May was 55.4)
  • Consumer credit for May -$9.1 billion versus consensus estimate of -$3.0 billion (April revised to -$14.9 billion versus +$1.0 billion....clearly the Federal Reserve has an issue)
  • Trade Balance for May -$42.3 billion versus consensus estimate of -$39.4 billion (April -$40.3 billion)
  • Retail Sales June -0.5% versus consensus estimate of -0.2% (May revised to -1.1% versus -1.2%
  • NY Fed Empire Manufacturing July 5.08 versus consensus estimate of 18.0 (June 19.57)
  • Philadelphia Fed Survey July 5.1 versus consensus estimate of 10.1 (June 8.0)
  • National Assoc. of Home Builders July 14..lowest since April 2009 (June revised to 16 from 17)
  • Housing Starts June 549,000 versus consensus estimate of 575,000 (May revised down to 578,000 from 593,000)
  • Existing Home Sales May 5.37 million versus consensus estimate of 5.09 million (April was 5.66 million)
  •  New Home Sales June 330,000 versus consensus estimate of 310,000 (May revised to 267,000 from 300,000....267,000 lowest level on record)
  • Consumer Confidence July 50.4 versus consensus estimate of 51 (June  raised to 54.3 from 52.9)
  • Durable Orders June -1.0% versus consensus estimate of +1.0% (May reduced to 1.2% from 1.6%)
  • Fed's Beige Book...not viewed as encouraging, reflective of Bernanke's earlier reference to the economy being "unusually uncertain"
  • Q2 GDP 2.4% versus consensus estimate of 2.5%. Q1 revised to 3.7% from 2.7% while the government revised down GDP figures for 2007, 2008 and 2009
  • Chicago PMI  July 62.3 versus consensus estimate of 56.3 (June 59.1)
  • University of MI Sentiment final for July 67.8 versus consensus estimate of 67.5 (June final was 76)
Grandpa has set the timer for 2013 given the GDP revisions as will likely be 3 years before the "shrooms" wear off given the 37% increase to Q1 GDP on Friday. It took the government until 2010 to revise down 2007, 2008 and 2009 GDP.

Sunday Comics

Ahhhhh Ben, what exactly did you mean...
outlook for the U.S. economy is "unusually uncertain"?
went on record stating,
"You're seeing private investment expand again,
job growth starting to come back.
And that's very encouraging"



SEC's New Protocol for assessing fines
on companies accused of fraud and
or accounting improprieties.
No changes to "no ask no tell" policy
on admission of wrongdoing.
...and no one every does jail time...




Hey Charlie Rangel, Maxine Waters wants to read
it before returning to the library




Standard SEC issue since passage of
Financial Reform. SEC is now "selectively" exempt
from Freedom of Information Act.



Likely number of politicians who read the
financial reform bill prior to voting.


BP's legal strategy...offer a one time payment and
you promise not to sue us...trust us to do the right thing


Alan Greenpan: economy is having a modest recovery,
but right now there's a "pause" in that recovery,
 so it feels like a "quasi-recession."



Alan Greenspan: a rising stock market will do more to
stimulate the economy than any of the remedies
now being discussed.



 











Wall Street robots create best performing month in a year even as billions of dollars left the equity market, no trading volume and poor fundamental economic data

The exploits of Wall Street's mathematician robots churn out a positive month. July yielded the best performing month in a year as the S and P 500 gained 6.88% while the Dow gained 7.1%. These "annual-like" gains occurred even as:
  • billions of dollars were withdrawn from the U.S. equity market
  • trading volume was anemic
  • fundamental economic data shows clear signs of a slowdown
Significant Dollars Removed from the U.S. Equity Market

Investment Company Institute (ICI) reports $8.797 billion was withdrawn from domestic equity funds through 7/21/10. This represents an average of $2.932 billion per week with yet another week to be reported. For the entire month of June, ICI reported $8.076 billion withdrawn from domestic equity funds and their first report of June included the final 5 days of May.

From the week ending May 5, 2010 through the week ending 7/21/10, $40.515 Billion has been withdrawn from the U.S. equity funds.

Anemic Trading Volume

The S and P 500 clocked in a 70.89 point (6.88%) gain for the month of July on an average daily trading volume of 4.513 billion shares. During the month of June, the S and P 500 was down 58.70 points (5.39%) on average daily trading volume of 5.005 billion shares. The S and P 500 launches 6.88% while month over month average daily trading volume falls 9.8%.

Grandpa's interest piqued while dissecting the curious 6 consecutive up days in the S and P 500. From July 6th through July 13th, the S and P 500 gained 72.76 points (7.1%). This gargantuan move occurred on a paltry 4.290 billion average daily trading volume (223 million fewer shares per day than the July monthly average).

More evidence of manipulative trickery is evident after comparing the two biggest July up days to the two biggest down days in June. The two biggest down days in June (4th and 29th) collectively produced a loss of 71.28 points on average trading volume of 6.159 billion shares per day. The two biggest up days in July were contrived on 1.280 billion less shares per day.

Grandpa's "granddaddy" validation of manipulative and deceptive components became even more evident when May was included in the analysis. The down and dirty:

S and P 500 Monthly Recap
  • July 2010 UP 70.89 points (6.88%) on daily average daily trading volume of 4.513 billion shares
  • June 2010 DOWN 56.70 points (5.39%) on average daily trading volume of 5.005 billion shares
  • May 2010 DOWN 92.28 points (8.2%) on average daily trading volume of 6.383 billion shares
July's 6.88% gain occurred on average daily trading volume of 492 million fewer shares than July and 1.87 billion fewer shares than May.

Ben Bernanke's "Unusually Uncertain" Economic Data
  • Weekly initial jobless claims averaged 457,000 for the month
  • Pending Home Sales DOWN 30% month over month
  • Non-farm payrolls for June DOWN 125,000 on a consensus estimate of down 100,000
  • Factory Orders DOWN 1.4% versus consensus estimate of down 0.6%
  • ISM Services 53.8 versus consensus of 55 (prior was 55.4)
  • Trade Deficit -42.3 billion versus consensus estimate of -39.4 billion (prior -40.3 billion)
  • Retail Sales -0.5% versus consensus estimate of -0.2%
  • Existing Home Sales 5.37 million versus consensus estimate of 5.09 million (prior 5.66 million)
  •  New Home Sales 330,000 versus consensus estimate of 310,000 (prior revised to 267,000 from 300,000....267,000 lowest level on record)
  • Consumer Confidence 50.4 versus consensus estimate of 51 (prior raised to 54.3 from 52.9)
  • Durable Orders -1.0% versus consensus estimate of +1.0% (prior reduced to 1.2% from 1.6%)
  • Q2 GDP 2.4% versus consensus estimate of 2.5%. Q1 revised to 3.7% from 2.7% while the government revised down GDP figures for 2007, 2008 and 2009
Once Wall Street repositions the roulette table magnets, the casino will open for business as usual Monday at 9:30 am EDT. The High Frequency Traders have replenished their pantry with Cheetos and Red Bull and will surely commence with yet another upward romp in the market. After all, they (i.e. robotic computer gamers) are the only one's trading the market.

Another "annual-like" return is assured for the month of August predicated upon economic data continuing to reflect a downward slope, another $10 billion is withdrawn from the U.S. equity funds and volume drops another 10%.

Mr. and Ms. Market are waiting patiently for the average retail investor to come off the sideline and provide the catalyst for another 5 to 10% upward move. When they sense they have sucked in the final flock of lambs, you can be assured the market will sell, once again proving to the retail investor who controls the market.